Today was options expiration day.  I had 3 put spreads on SDS that needed tending.  This trade was originally initiated in March, sending me a positive cash flow of $1,028.97.  Today, I covered the short options for $(779.98), and my long options will expire.  This nets me a $248.99 profit on the trade.

Now, since I still believe that the market is overvalued, I would normally consider rolling this position into a new position.  However, I preempted this with SDS put spreads in August and an SSO put earlier this week.

If the market trends higher over the coming weeks, I would be tempted to add to this position or take gains in other positions.

Today, I’ll be the guy on right.

Basel 3, a new set of international banking rules, was passed today.  The markets cheered this triumph, and stocks rose.  However, there are still many underlying problems both with our economy and banking system.

To add to this, I still believe the market is well overvalued (and has been for most of 2010).  John Hussman echoes this in his weekly commentary.

Betting against this short-term market blip, I initiated a short position by purchasing the January 2011, $46 put option on SSO, for $9.30.

This trade may look familiar, since I ease into and out of SSO and SDS positions throughout the year.  In February, I bought two SSO puts and sold them for a profit in May.  In June, I shorted SSO shares outright and then covered them for a profit in late August.  Here is a nice visual of how I have bet against the market throughout the year.  Instead of buying low then selling high, I have become rather adept at selling high and buying low.

(Image originally sourced from Google Finance)

Two months ago, I proclaimed that the market was up and therefore time to sell.  At the time, I shorted SSO (an ETF that positively tracks the S&P 500 performance).  The market has since fallen from 1,115 to 1,052, equating to a 5.7% drop.  Today, I took profits by covering this position.

Consider the rationale…

Long term, I remain bearish on both the US economy and S&P 500.  However, in the short term, the newswire is bursting with bad news–housing sales plummet, Greece debt auction is weak, consumer sentiment falls, Yen rises against USD, Ireland debt rating is downgraded–how much worse can the wire get?  I’m not entirely sure, but I would feel too greedy for having been correct on this trade and not taking some profits.

Keeping score, this two month trade netted me a 9.7% return of $164.

14-Jun SSO short 50 37.15  $   1,850.46
29-Jun SSO dividend 50 0.08066  $        (4.03)
24-Aug SSO cover 50 33.5  $  (1,682.00)
           $      164.43

In other news, here is a great link as to why the housing consensus was incredibly wrong this morning.  The consensus predicted home sales of 4.65 million.  The author predicted a very low 3.95 million homes sold.  Actual sales came in at an even lower 3.83 million homes sold.

One last musing…  the relationship between commodities and bond yields disturbs me.  Although oil is starting to look attractive in the low $70s, I am intrigued by the paradox of high gold prices concurrent with low yields.  Perhaps more on this later.

With the market increase over the past week and a half, I decided to add a negative position.  I shorted 50 shares of SSO at $37.15.

A continuing theme I have opined about since October, is that the economy is on shaky ground.  Further, nothing in the private sector has convincingly driven growth—a theme highlighted by John Hussman yesterday in his Weekly Comment.  At this stage of the game, I refuse to believe that any published GDP is a sign of relief unless it is concurrently free from federal deficit spending.  In my eyes, taking on debt to increase assets fails to address the negative equity problem.

Independent from the economy, I still believe the market is overvalued, and this trade is a direct play on that theory.

As for executing the trade, and given the nature of how ultra leveraged ETFs work, I would rather short the ultra long (SSO) than long the ultra short (SDS).  Yes, there is always a risk of a broker forcing me to cover in a squeeze, but the long positions are also susceptible to sudden price drops.

To hit the rewind button, I originally bought the June $44 put for $8 on 2/2/10 and sold it on 5/25/10 for $10.20, netting me a gain of $420.96.  Today it is only worth $6.15.  Clearly this is an example of buying low, selling high, and essentially buying low again.

With the recent drop in the market over the past month, I decided to take profits on my SSO puts (a trade that bet on the market falling).  This trade also makes sense since the options expire next month–I would have been forced to act in June had I held onto the position.

As you can see below, I was behind on this trade through all of March and April.  Yet, I still managed a nice gain here.  The opposite side of the trade was ahead for two months and ended up with a loss.  Given the choice of the two, I’ll happily trail behind for a bit if I believe the trade will work in my favor.  (The graph is of SSO, the security that the put option is derived from; the arrow is my entry point on 2/2/10, when SSO traded at about $37).

(image from Google Finance)

Even after exiting this downward position, I still maintain a substantial market short position.  Further, if the market was to rally from here, I would consider recylcing this trade.

Keeping score:

2-Feb SSO Jun$44 buy put 2 8  $  (1,609.50)  
25-May SSO Jun$44 sold put 2 10.2  $   2,030.46  
           $      420.96 26.2%

I know who it is before I even answer the phone.  At 9:40AM, the market has just opened, and I already know that at least one of my short positions has been covered…

“Hello?”

“Hi… this is [broker] calling to inform you that there was an SEC mandated forced buy of 1 share of CYN from you account…”

Seriously!  Seriously?  1 share?  You’re going to pawn me off one share so that my position is now 49 shares?  Who will want me to buy 49 shares from them?  Yuck.

So my 1 share was bought at $49.85.  I decided to cover the entire position later in the day at $49.55.  Seeing my thesis erode, I would liked to have covered in the high $40s, perhaps a dollar or so lower.  In review, the FDIC-Imperial deal to CYN was clearly a blow to my short position; the deal was instantly accretive to City National’s book value.  Further, I now recognize that I may not have had the right stock for the play–I wanted to profit from a fall in California banks, thinking all would suffer (which still might happen).  However, even though CYN is in a losing region, it is probably the best of a bad lot.  Whether or not this thesis eventually plays out is no longer worth my coin.  At this point, I take the loss and move on.

From a portfolio perspective, I wanted to keep a similar amount of negative exposure to replace the covering of CYN.  So, I purchased two put options on SSO (the double levered S&P500 ETF).  These were the June $44 contracts, at $8.00 each.

Even in a loss, I still keep score:

3-Aug CYN short 40 40.66  $   1,619.35
18-Nov CYN dividend 40 0.1  $        (4.00)
20-Nov CYN bought to cover 40 37.45  $  (1,505.00)
18-Dec CYN short 50 41.22  $   2,053.94
2-Feb CYN bought to cover 1  49.85  $       (56.85)
2-Feb CYN bought to cover 49  49.55  $  (2,434.98)
           $     (327.54)

« Previous Page

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.