Last week, my broker abruptly ran out of SSO shortable shares, forcing me to buy them and consequently eliminated my portfolio hedge. Today, I replenished a portion of my market hedge by selling a call spread on SSO using the $50 and $60 strike prices. Recall, I initiated a similar position in March 2011, which concluded in January 2012, netting me $621. Over the next few weeks, I will look to build on this short position. Top Five is updated accordingly.

Trade details:

SSO 50Sep12C short -2 8.25  $    1,642.45
SSO 60Sep12C bought 2 3.27  $     (661.52)

I’m upset to report that my broker ran out of shortable shares of SSO, and my position was subjected to a mandatory buy-in.  Hence, my largest position and entire portfolio short hedge was bought to cover at $52.76.

I will spend the weekend contemplating how I want to proceed.  One choice would be to sell out-of-the-money call spreads, as I have done historically.  Another choice would be to initiate a short position in E-mini S&P 500 futures.  I will update the Top Five page next week when I somehow refund this position.

I had a lot of positions change today, and a lot of money moved around.  I’ll tackle this step by step.

Options Expiration

First, options expiration was Friday, and I had two positions to account for.  My short GDX put (at $52) finished out of the money, netting me a cool $450.  My short SSO call spread (short $50, long $60) finished in the money, but still netted me $621, which is the difference between the $787 premium I received in March and the current position value of $166.  For an introduction to options, click here.  To learn more about call spreads, click here.

With selling the SSO call at $50 and the shares ending at $50.83, I was assigned 200 shares (2 option contracts at 100 shares each) at $50 each.  This increased my portfolio short position by $10k ($50 x 200 shares), which is a significant increase.  To match this exposure on the short side, I decided to deploy cash toward the long side.

Investing in Fama-French

Earlier this month, I expressed my discontent with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and argued that the Fama-French 4 Factor Model was superior.  Reasonably thinking, since I had to purchase equities, I was able to invest in the risk factor methodologies that Fama and French support.  To do this, I purchased exchange traded funds TILT and PDP.  TILT is designed to replicate the Fama-French 3 Factor Model, focused on market, style, and size, by tilting the portfolio toward value stocks and small cap stocks.  PDP is a momentum fund, with momentum as the fourth risk factor in the Fama-French 4 Factor Model.

Trade Details

I purchased 150 shares of TILT at $54.65 and 65 shares of PDP at $24.93.  These long equity positions total $9.8k, which aligns well with my new $10k short position (from the SSO options).  One trade execution issue I had with purchasing TILT is market impact.  Since the fund trades on low volume, my bid moved the price.  As you can see, my 150 shares were the first traded shares of the day.

With an illiquid security, I verified that the net asset value ($54.67) was in line with what I paid.

Top Five is updated to incorporate changes to GDX, SSO, and TILT.

 

A year ago, I argued that a combination of floods in Australia, drought in Russia, and lack of adequate snowfall in the US grain states would dampen the current amount of global wheat supply, sending prices higher.  Purchasing the JJG, the grains fund, seemed to be a prudent play on the topic, and through February, proved to be a fortuitous investment.  Alas, I overstayed my welcome and exited my position at a loss.

 

1/4/2011 JJG bought 30 52.05  $   (1,568.05)
1/19/2012 JJG sold 30 42.5187  $    1,266.58
           $     (301.47)

Going forward, I will likely replace this position with another real asset, perhaps timber.  Moving to cash also eases up my margin account, where I may be assigned two options positions expiring tomorrow.  I’ll be keeping an eye on the 50 strike for SSO and 52 strike for GDX.

Oil Field Bet!

Last month when I purchased DBA, I was looking for someplace liquid to park assets while participating in any upside inflation.  Unfortunately, I have been underestimating ETF futures roll expenses for DBA, JJG, and DBC.  Thus, I was willing to exit my DBA position today (at a manageable $50 loss) to fund a new position.

 The new position is a field bet on oil producers and servicers.  Oil markets seem to have a structural tightness to them that are unlikely to ease in the near future.  Furthermore, energy serves as a real asset by correlating to inflation.  Today I purchased producers XOMCVX and servicers SLB, BHI, & HAL, all of which have at least a four star rating from both S&P and Morningstar.  To hedge my equity correlation exposure, I took a negative equity position by shorting SSO (this trade accumulates to my existing SSO short position).

XOM long 20 78  $   (1,567.00)
CVX long 10 99.53  $   (1,002.30)
SLB long 15 71.54  $   (1,080.10)
BHI long 20 54.39  $   (1,094.80)
HAL long 30 30  $   (1,094.77)

>>>

SSO short 100 43.8  $    4,369.97

>>>

10/3/2011 DBA long 100 29.7  $   (2,977.00)
11/18/2011 DBA sold 100 29.335  $    2,926.44
           $       (50.56)

>>>

Top Five is updated to reflect for the changes in SSO and DBA.

Last week I covered one of my major short positions, SDS.  Since then, the market has risen 5%, and the move saved me roughly $500.  Today, I reinstated a short position by shorting 40 shares of SSO at $44.10, bringing my total count to -100 SSO.

Reasons for shorting the market are threefold:

1)      I still believe that the market is overvalued.  With the S&P 500 at 1225, the market is pricing in future earnings of about $94 at a P/E multiple of 13 (where $94 x 13 = 1222).  However, this $94 of earnings likely assumes a continuation of above-average profit margins, which is unlikely, and relies on a continuation of economic expansion, which is also unlikely (perhaps more on this in a future posts).  I do not believe we will see multiple expansion.

2)      As mentioned last week, the performance of levered ETFs (for a time period more than one day) is dependent upon geometric, not arithmetic, returns.  So, shorting such a security, like SSO, captures this opportunity.

3)      On a personal note, I’ve come to the realization that my personal future income will be highly correlated to the performance of the stock market.  Therefore, if I were to model future labor income into my asset allocation equation, I would need an increasing allocation to short positions to hedge this labor income.  This factor will likely contribute to future short positions.

As far as commodity positions are concerned, I had an offer on DBA late in the afternoon, but it did not fill.

Top Five is updated accordingly.

Today, I swapped out of SDS and purchased DBA to replace it.  Let’s walk through the trade as it alters the Top Five.

As a review, SDS is an levered ETF that performs 2x opposite of the market’s daily return.  I originally made the purchases in September and December 2009 because I wanted to hedge my long positions with a market short position in a long-only account.  After making some tactical errors, I learned that levered ETFs should not be owned by investors with time horizons longer than a day.  Here’s why…

Arithmetic versus Geometric

Most people understand an average to be an arithmetic average.  That is, in a series of returns {+50%,-50%}, the arithmetic average is 0%.  However, the geometric average takes into account previous movements.  The same series above thus yields -25%, where 1*(1+.50)*(1+-.50) = 0.75.  The longer an investor holds this position, the longer he is exposed to the compounded downward effect of the leverage more so than the levered upward gain.  Over time, this diminishes investor returns.  Consider this example of a levered long oil ETF and a levered short oil ETF:

The Proshares Ultra Oil & Gas ETF (DIG) and UltraShort Oil and Gas ETF (NYSE: DUG) are the respective double long and double short for the IYE benchmark. During the 2008 period of massive oil price fluctuations, DUG lost a very respectable 19%, while DIG came over the top with a 69% loss.
Source:  Investopedia
 
As soon as an investor holds a levered ETF for more than a day, he is exposed to this effect.  Back to my SDS example, I wanted to short the market.  Even though the market moved against me for an expected loss of 20%, the compounded levered downward effect resulted in a loss closer to 30%.
9/15/2009 SDS 50 40.9  $   (2,052.00)
12/1/2009 SDS 50 35.64  $   (1,789.00)
10/3/2011 SDS 100 26.511  $    2,644.04
         $   (1,196.96)

The Good News

The good news is that investors can take advantage of these securities by shorting them.  For example, in a margin account, I shorted SSO in Decemer 2010.  Since SSO is levered to the market, and I believe the market will fall, shorting SSO enables me to take a bearish position and benefit from the downward leverage.

Swapping to DBA

With cash from the sale of SDS, I purchased DBA, an agriculture ETF.  The main purpose for buying DBA is that I needed a place to park money.  Since I already have a significant cash position (see asset allocation), I needed a relatively safe asset that benefits from long term rising prices, is safe, and is not US Treasuries.  DBA seems to fit the bill, for now.

Overlap

By owning DBA, I have substantial overlap with two existing holdings:  DBC (commodities) and JJG (grains).  Over the next several weeks (or months), I will likely trade out of one of these positions, possibly by selling calls.  While having three positions with overlap is not ideal, it allows me some trading flexibility in the near term.  The DBA purchase was 100 shares at $29.70 per share.

Top Five is updated accordingly.

Options expiration was this week, and I had a short market position (from a December trade) to roll over.  This resulted in me selling a call spread on SSO, which consists of 2 short January ’12 call options at $50 and 2 long January ’12 call options at $60.

SSO is a levered ETF that moves in the same diretion of market performance.  Therefore, SSO will appreciate by 2% for every 1% advance by the market.  By selling call options, I am betting the market will fall.

The resulting payouts for this trade are roughly as follows:  if the market stays flat or declines by any amount, I will make about $800; if the market appreciates by 10% or more, I will lose about $1,200.  The payout for the market appreciating up to 10% will be a prorated amount.

Top Five is updated to reflect this trade.

Earlier this month, I sold shares of SDS to take a tax loss and shorted shares of SSO to maintain the position’s exposure.  Today, I made a similar two part transaction, which gives me a desired tax loss for 2010 while maintaining downward market exposure.  I bought to cover my SDS put spread (initiated in August) and replaced this position by selling an SSO call spread.

The trades:  Bought To Cover 4 contracts of 36/28 SDS Jan11 Put @ $7.75 for a total of -$3,115.06.  Sold To Open 4 contracts of 50/43 SSO Mar11 Call @ 4.00 for a total of $1,504.93.  Ideally, this replacement position would have been larger, but I didn’t have enough funds in the account.  Hopefully I can add to this short position in the near future.

For those of you new to harvesting capital tax losses, please read the example in the post directly below.

Both of these trades impact my Top Five, which has been updated accordingly.

These days, I can see my breath on my way into the office in the morning.  Once inside, a newly displayed Christmas tree decorates a main entrance.  Yes, it’s that time of year, where everyone starts planning for holiday parties, focuses on the final push of fantasy football, and hectically finishes their yearend shopping.  But as much as that artificial tree glimmers in decor, deep down I know that I’ve got some end-of-year capital gains to tend to.

With equities roaring over the past two days, I decided to take a tax loss on one of my short positions, while initiating a similar position with a different security.  Now, there’s a good lesson here, so I’ll walk through it…

>>> 

 Any profit on a securities transaction results in a taxable gain.  Likewise, any loss on a securities transaction results in a taxable loss.  During a calendar year, an individual can offset capital gains with capital losses.  The net capital gain factors into an individual’s income tax.  In effort to thwart the capital gains tax, someone could take a tax loss and then immediately reestablish the position with the same security; however, a wash sale rule exists that prohibits this activity for thirty days (in which the tax loss would be nullified).  Example:  George buys stock ABC at $20 and sells it at $14.  He has a capital loss of $6.  If he repurchases stock ABC within thirty days, the capital loss is void because of the wash sale rule.

To get around this, let’s say George believes that stock XYZ behaves similarly to stock ABC.  Perhaps they are competitors in the same industry or ETFs tracking similar indexes.  George can sell his ABC stock at a capital loss and immediately purchase stock XYZ.  In doing so, George maintains his general position and takes a tax loss in the process.

>>> 

What I expressed in the example is similar to what I accomplished today.  I owned SDS, which is an ETF that moves opposite the market.  Since I had a tax loss on it, I sold SDS.  To replace this position, I shorted SSO, which is an ETF that moves with the market.  I went from being long a short (long SDS), to short a long (short SSO).  My overall position remained neutral while I was able to take a tax loss of $2k.

The trades:  sold 100 SDS @ $25.48; shorted 60 SSO @ $44.95

The Top Five has been updated to reflect these trades.

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.