Gold miners GDX has been falling the past two months and seems to represent some nice value.  Meanwhile the price of gold has remained relatively flat since the beginning of the year.  This dichotomy is unlikely to persist.  Let’s examine.

(Image from Marketwatch)

Reasonably thinking, I am bullish on gold for three reasons.  First, gold is a safe haven asset, and investors can flock to it in times of turmoil.  Europe anyone?  Second, US real interest rates are negative.  That is, a ten year investment yields an investor only 1.88% per year, whereas inflation will be more than this.  A ten year investment in a US Treasury Bond will lose real purchasing power in ten years.  With fixed income securities and stocks offering unattractive returns (think 1970s), gold has historically appreciated as an alternative.  Third, gold price increases over the past decade have been driven by buyers in emerging asia.  Buyers in India and China represent permanent demand as investors suffer from capital outflow controls (financial repression), which I view as unlikely to abate in the upcoming years.

Gold miners extract gold from the ground and sell it at market prices.  So, if gold rises, then the revenue for gold miners increases.  To ensure that the increased revenue is captured by shareholders (and not employees’ wages or governments’ taxes), we can examine companies gross margins.  The top three companies have margins that are either stable or increasing.  Thus, increased gold prices should be flowing through the income statement as increased earnings to shareholders.

With a solid thesis for gold, and some assurance from gold miners income statements, a divergence of the metal and stocks seems illogical.  One area of blame is that analysts are forecasting gold prices at $1600 an ounce or lower.  If this is the case, then long gold miners and short gold would be a prudent position.  However, given my arguments, I’m happy to be a gold owner, even if the price fluctuates downward in the interim.

I am already long gold miners in the form of GDX, GDXJ, NEM, GOLD, GORO, and FNV.  Today, I initiated a synthetic long position, by selling a GDX Dec12 $39 Put and buying a GDX Dec12 $44 Call.  See the options-basic page for the derivation of this strategy.  The trade cost me $200.00.  I am on the hook if GDX falls below $39 and have unlimited upside if GDX advances beyond $44.

Top Five is updated to reflect my increased GDX exposure.

I’m upset to report that my broker ran out of shortable shares of SSO, and my position was subjected to a mandatory buy-in.  Hence, my largest position and entire portfolio short hedge was bought to cover at $52.76.

I will spend the weekend contemplating how I want to proceed.  One choice would be to sell out-of-the-money call spreads, as I have done historically.  Another choice would be to initiate a short position in E-mini S&P 500 futures.  I will update the Top Five page next week when I somehow refund this position.

I had a lot of positions change today, and a lot of money moved around.  I’ll tackle this step by step.

Options Expiration

First, options expiration was Friday, and I had two positions to account for.  My short GDX put (at $52) finished out of the money, netting me a cool $450.  My short SSO call spread (short $50, long $60) finished in the money, but still netted me $621, which is the difference between the $787 premium I received in March and the current position value of $166.  For an introduction to options, click here.  To learn more about call spreads, click here.

With selling the SSO call at $50 and the shares ending at $50.83, I was assigned 200 shares (2 option contracts at 100 shares each) at $50 each.  This increased my portfolio short position by $10k ($50 x 200 shares), which is a significant increase.  To match this exposure on the short side, I decided to deploy cash toward the long side.

Investing in Fama-French

Earlier this month, I expressed my discontent with the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and argued that the Fama-French 4 Factor Model was superior.  Reasonably thinking, since I had to purchase equities, I was able to invest in the risk factor methodologies that Fama and French support.  To do this, I purchased exchange traded funds TILT and PDP.  TILT is designed to replicate the Fama-French 3 Factor Model, focused on market, style, and size, by tilting the portfolio toward value stocks and small cap stocks.  PDP is a momentum fund, with momentum as the fourth risk factor in the Fama-French 4 Factor Model.

Trade Details

I purchased 150 shares of TILT at $54.65 and 65 shares of PDP at $24.93.  These long equity positions total $9.8k, which aligns well with my new $10k short position (from the SSO options).  One trade execution issue I had with purchasing TILT is market impact.  Since the fund trades on low volume, my bid moved the price.  As you can see, my 150 shares were the first traded shares of the day.

With an illiquid security, I verified that the net asset value ($54.67) was in line with what I paid.

Top Five is updated to incorporate changes to GDX, SSO, and TILT.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.