Quote from John Hussman on Monday:
Many investment professionals have developed a habit of forming expectations based on nothing more than extrapolation of short-term trends in the data, even when those extrapolations are inconsistent with market history or well-established economic relationships.
Quote from Laszlo Birinyi on Thursday:
If the market is continually picking black, picking red is not necessarily a good idea.
>>>
I’m bearish on the stock market because I believe the US economy has the potential to encounter hardships in the near future, and valuations are too high. Even though some advisors continue to play the momentum game (Birinyi above), I would like to believe that a little a leg work will be rewarded.
To execute this line of thinking, I sold three bull put spreads on SDS (-33+26 Sep10). SDS performs 2x the daily direction of the S&P 500. Since I believe that the S&P 500 will go down, SDS would then go up.
Dissecting the put spread…
Sold SDS 33 Sep10 P @ $4.22
Bought SDS 26 Sep10 P @ $0.74
Possible outcomes:
- If the market falls only slightly by September, SDS will close at $33 or higher. In this case, both options would expire worthless, and I would then keep the proceeds of today’s trade: $1,028.97. This is the difference between the sale of the $33 strike option ($4.22) and the purchase of the $26 strike option ($0.74) minus a commission. (Remember that each option is worth 100 shares, and I sold 3 option contracts; $3.48*100*3-$15.03 = $1,028.97). Even if the market tanks and SDS significantly increases, my maximum gain is $1,028.97.
- Perhaps my thesis is wrong (the trade moves completely against me), and SDS falls below $26 in September. I now owe the difference between the $33 strike that I sold and the $26 strike that I purchased ($700 for each spread, meaning a total of $2,100). The $2,100 loss would be offset by the $1,028.07 already in hand, so my maximum loss is $1,071.93.
- Now, let’s say that SDS ends up somewhere in between $26 and $33. I could win or lose depending on where it ends up. My Breakeven point is $33 – $3.48 = $29.52. Now add a fraction to account for commissions to make the breakeven $29.57. So above $29.57 I make money, below $29.57 I lose money.
June 15, 2010
The market’s up, time to sell: initiated SSO short 20100615
Posted by ReasonablyThinking under All Commentary, SDS, SSO, Stock purchases, bought to cover, Trade highlights | Tags: SSO, SDS |Leave a Comment
With the market increase over the past week and a half, I decided to add a negative position. I shorted 50 shares of SSO at $37.15.
A continuing theme I have opined about since October, is that the economy is on shaky ground. Further, nothing in the private sector has convincingly driven growth—a theme highlighted by John Hussman yesterday in his Weekly Comment. At this stage of the game, I refuse to believe that any published GDP is a sign of relief unless it is concurrently free from federal deficit spending. In my eyes, taking on debt to increase assets fails to address the negative equity problem.
Independent from the economy, I still believe the market is overvalued, and this trade is a direct play on that theory.
As for executing the trade, and given the nature of how ultra leveraged ETFs work, I would rather short the ultra long (SSO) than long the ultra short (SDS). Yes, there is always a risk of a broker forcing me to cover in a squeeze, but the long positions are also susceptible to sudden price drops.
To hit the rewind button, I originally bought the June $44 put for $8 on 2/2/10 and sold it on 5/25/10 for $10.20, netting me a gain of $420.96. Today it is only worth $6.15. Clearly this is an example of buying low, selling high, and essentially buying low again.