Stock purchases, bought to cover


With option expiration scheduled to take place on Friday, I must be prepared.  Two of my positions that are set to expire are my Freddie Mac (FMCC) puts and housing (ITB) puts, both of which are in the money.  My intent is to exit the Freddie Mac position, since the stock is trading over the counter, and to roll the housing position.  To roll the housing position, I simply need to purchase put options for some time in the future and sell/convert my current puts (that expire Friday).  To initiate this strategy, I purchased 7 ITB put options today, with an expiration of January 2011, for $5.90 each.  I will obviously exit my 6 July ITB puts before the week’s end.

Independent from the above, I decided to increase my short exposure to financial companies.  In the long term, I foresee a subdued economy where bank loan losses increase.  As such, I shorted 25 shares of the financial exchange traded fund UYG at $57.60.  In addition, I believe provisions for loan losses (funds set aside for loan losses) are currently too small; an increase in quarterly provisions could stymie bank profits.  Furthermore, it is possible that European credit concerns throughout the second quarter reduced lending, which could hinder quarterly revenue.  Therefore, I purchased an August put option, with a strike of $32, on the financial bull exchange traded fund FAS for $8.90.

So, the UYG is the bearish long term play; FAS is the bearish short term play.  JPM reports its quarterly earnings on Thursday; BAC and C report their quarterly earnings on Friday.

You can read more about my perspective on housing, banks, and the economy by reading my latest opinion piece:  Housing, Economy, Banks–A Three Legged Stool With Three Broken Legs.

With the market increase over the past week and a half, I decided to add a negative position.  I shorted 50 shares of SSO at $37.15.

A continuing theme I have opined about since October, is that the economy is on shaky ground.  Further, nothing in the private sector has convincingly driven growth—a theme highlighted by John Hussman yesterday in his Weekly Comment.  At this stage of the game, I refuse to believe that any published GDP is a sign of relief unless it is concurrently free from federal deficit spending.  In my eyes, taking on debt to increase assets fails to address the negative equity problem.

Independent from the economy, I still believe the market is overvalued, and this trade is a direct play on that theory.

As for executing the trade, and given the nature of how ultra leveraged ETFs work, I would rather short the ultra long (SSO) than long the ultra short (SDS).  Yes, there is always a risk of a broker forcing me to cover in a squeeze, but the long positions are also susceptible to sudden price drops.

To hit the rewind button, I originally bought the June $44 put for $8 on 2/2/10 and sold it on 5/25/10 for $10.20, netting me a gain of $420.96.  Today it is only worth $6.15.  Clearly this is an example of buying low, selling high, and essentially buying low again.

With the market decline today, I decided to increase my DBC position from 50 to 100 shares (purchased at $21.50).  My commodities allocation is still lower than I would like, so I may add to this position down the road.  Specifically, oil looks interesting if I could purchase it (USL) a little cheaper.

I purchased 50 shares of USL (US 12 month oil futures) today, at $35.10 per share.  USL is an exchange traded fund that mimics the price of oil.  Generally speaking, if oil prices rise, USL will also rise.

Reasonably thinking, oil has been on a slide this month, falling from nearly $90 per barrel to under $70 per barrel.  As for safe havens, oil has decoupled from gold over the past month.  This is mainly attributable eurozone fears and perhaps decreasing Chinese demand for commodities.  In fact, many of the metals (copper, nickel, etc.) have fallen along with oil this month, yet gold has managed to hold its own.  Additional worries and decreased consumption could easily push oil (and metals) lower.  This is the risk I’m bearing in this trade.  (Side note:  exiting my copper position in March turned out to be a shrewd manuever).

Gold decouples from Oil in May

(image from Google Finance)

Metals fall with Oil in May, Gold remains steady

(image from Google Finance)

My first thesis to this trade is that I still believe geopolitical tensions in the Middle East (Israel-Iran) could cause a supply shock in oil, sending prices higher.  A second idea is that the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf could prompt congress to pass restrictive legislation onto the oil industry; discussion plans for new wells have already been scrapped since the incident.  A final argument is that I would rather own something tangible rather than a currency right now; it may be easy to argue against the euro, but other currencies are similarly susceptible to declines.

As for my portfolio, this will increase my allocation to commodities, which was previously below my goal of 10%.  My portfolio allocation goals can be seen at the conclusion of my 1Q10 Performance.

Similar to the trade I made last month, due to low broker inventory, I was forced to cover the remainder of my ITB short position.  To replace this exposure I purchased two October put options at the $20 strike.

Transactions details:

100 ITB bought to cover @ $14.21

2 ITB $20 Oct10 P purchased @ $6.00

This week, I’ve seen a few mentions that volatility is low.  The implication is that investors are complacent.  This contradicts with my general bearish views given the potential economic pitfalls.  Betting on increased panic, or volatility can be accomplished by trading VXX.  Today, I purchased 65 shares of VXX at $21.12.

Here is a historical view of how the CBOE volatility index has contrasted to the S&P500.

(image from MarketWatch)

Quote from John Hussman on Monday:

Many investment professionals have developed a habit of forming expectations based on nothing more than extrapolation of short-term trends in the data, even when those extrapolations are inconsistent with market history or well-established economic relationships.

Quote from Laszlo Birinyi on Thursday:

If the market is continually picking black, picking red is not necessarily a good idea.

>>>

I’m bearish on the stock market because I believe the US economy has the potential to encounter hardships in the near future, and valuations are too high.  Even though some advisors continue to play the momentum game (Birinyi above), I would like to believe that a little a leg work will be rewarded.

To execute this line of thinking, I sold three bull put spreads on SDS (-33+26 Sep10).  SDS performs 2x the daily direction of the S&P 500.  Since I believe that the S&P 500 will go down, SDS would then go up.

Dissecting the put spread

Sold SDS 33 Sep10 P @ $4.22

Bought SDS 26 Sep10 P @ $0.74

Possible outcomes:

  • If the market falls only slightly by September, SDS will close at $33 or higher.  In this case, both options would expire worthless, and I would then keep the proceeds of today’s trade:  $1,028.97.  This is the difference between the sale of the $33 strike option ($4.22) and the purchase of the $26 strike option ($0.74) minus a commission.  (Remember that each option is worth 100 shares, and I sold 3 option contracts; $3.48*100*3-$15.03 = $1,028.97).  Even if the market tanks and SDS significantly increases, my maximum gain is $1,028.97.
  • Perhaps my thesis is wrong (the trade moves completely against me), and SDS falls below $26 in September.  I now owe the difference between the $33 strike that I sold and the $26 strike that I purchased ($700 for each spread, meaning a total of $2,100).  The $2,100 loss would be offset by the $1,028.07 already in hand, so my maximum loss is $1,071.93.
  • Now, let’s say that SDS ends up somewhere in between $26 and $33.  I could win or lose depending on where it ends up.  My Breakeven point is $33 – $3.48 = $29.52.  Now add a fraction to account for commissions to make the breakeven $29.57.  So above $29.57 I make money, below $29.57 I lose money.

My broker failed to maintain adequate inventory of ITB shares today, so I was forced to cover my ITB short position by 200 shares, at $13.84.  I replenished this position by purchasing three ITB 17.50 Jul10 Put options at $3.90; these are options that I have purchased before.  Even though I am down somewhat significantly on this trade, I remain steadfast that housing is overvalued, as evidenced by my continued financial backing.

I admit, there is still some uncertainty to this trade, but I bought copper today.  Here is my thesis…

An 8.8 magnitude earthquake bellowed Chile on Saturday.  The magnitude was about 500 times that of the first quake in Haiti, yet might have less damaging effects as it was located offshore and deeper in the ground.  Emergency crews are still swirling around cities, and from what I’ve gathered, looting has not been contained.  The focus of Chile’s citizens is focused on the basics–food, water, and safety.  In some areas, many are sleeping in the streets for fear that their structures will collapse; this problem has the potential to be amplified if aftershocks occur.

The economic impact is potentially global in nature.  Chile is the world’s largest copper producer, accounting for 1/3 of the world’s output.  Reasonably thinking, one can imagine that when the supply of copper is reduced, the price will rise.  Now, some copper mines have and will reopen, but impasses still remain.  Some mines are closed due to power outages, and highways to transport copper are impaired.  Besides, if I am Chilean citizen, I’m more worried about ensuring my safety more than exporting copper.

map of region

(image from BBC news)

Pricing this trade was an issue.  I read reports of copper prices soaring 5-8% on the news.  However, JJC, the Copper ETN, was only up about 2% at the open and stayed relatively stable throughout the day.  Obviously an investor would want to own the commodity before a supply shock.  Here, I’m betting on continued chaos, power/transport impairments, or aftershocks.

From an allocation perspective, I have been eager to add commodity exposure since I’m a little light in that area.  As for JJC, I owned (and sold) it years ago, but am always cautious with an exchange traded note.  The trade:  Bought 30 shares of JJC at $45.70.

>>>

Last night I published an introductory piece on how options work.  It is written for the novice stock trader.  Feel free to take a look.

A decline in housing remains one of my strongest investment ideas.  Let’s walk through the thought process…

Congress is subsidizing housing demand via its first-time homebuyer tax credit.  This pulls forward future demand.  When the program ends, demand starts to dwindle (and will fall to an even lower amount than what normally would have occured).  If Congress extends this subsidy, which happened last fall, even more demand will be pulled forward, and the fall will be even greater.  This ongoing game of taxing people to subsidize home ownership has consequences as demand cannot be artificially inflated forever.  Housing demand will decline.

A simple rule of economics:  when demand declines, prices fall.

 The second part of the equation is the onslaught of delinquencies and foreclosures coming onto the market.  Reasonably thinking, with an enormous amount of houses soon to be available for sale, constructing even more houses is not a good business to be in.

Another simple rule of economics:  when supply increases, prices fall.

The trade:  bought 2 ITB July put options at strike $17.50, for $4.50 each.  The breakeven is about $13, and the stock closed at $13.25 today.  (I made a very similar trade last month).

Next Page »